Our sun orbits the Milky Way’s center at an impressive 450,000 mph. Recently, scientists have discovered stars hurtling out of our galaxy at a couple million miles per hour. Could there be stars moving even faster somewhere out there?
After doing some calculations, Harvard University astrophysicists Avi Loeb and James Guillochon realized that yes, stars could go faster. Much faster. According to their analysis, which they describe in two papers recently posted online, stars can approach light speed. The results are theoretical, so no one will know definitively if this happens until astronomers detect such stellar speedsters—which, Loeb says, will be possible using next-generation telescopes.
But it’s not just speed these astronomers are after. If these superfast stars are found, they could help astronomers understand the evolution of the universe. In particular, they give scientists another tool to measure how fast the cosmos is expanding. Moreover, Loeb says, if the conditions are right, planets could orbit the stars, tagging along for an intergalactic ride. And if those planets happen to have life, he speculates, such stars could be a way to carry life from one galaxy to another.
It all started in 2005 when a star was discovered speeding away from our galaxyfast enough to escape the gravitational grasp of the Milky Way. Over the next few years, astronomers would find several more of what became known as hypervelocity stars. Such stars were cast out by the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. When a pair of stars orbiting each other gets close to the central black hole, which weighs about four million times as much as the sun, the three objects engage in a brief gravitational dance that ejects one of the stars. The other remains in orbit around the black hole.
Loeb and Guillochon realized that if instead you had two supermassive black holes on the verge of colliding, with a star orbiting around one of the black holes, the gravitational interactions could catapult the star into intergalactic space at speeds reaching hundreds of times those of hypervelocity stars.
This appears to be the most likely scenario that would produce the fastest stars in the universe, Loeb says. After all, supermassive black holes collide more often than you might think. Nearly all galaxies have supermassive black holes at their centers, and nearly all galaxies were the product of two smaller galaxies merging. When galaxies combine, so do their central black holes.
Loeb and Guillochon calculated that merging supermassive black holes would eject stars at a wide range of speeds. Only some would reach near light speed, but many of the rest would still be plenty fast. For example, Loeb says, the observable universe could have more than a trillion stars moving at a tenth of light speed, about 67 million miles per hour.
Because a single, isolated star streaking through intergalactic space would be so faint, only powerful future telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope , planned for launch in 2018, would be able to detect them. Even then, telescopes would likely only see the stars that have reached our galactic neighborhood. Many of the ejected stars probably would have formed near the centers of their galaxies, and would have been thrown out soon after their birth. That means that they would have been traveling for the vast majority of their lifetimes. The star’s age could therefore approximate how long the star has been traveling. Combining travel time with its measured speed, astronomers can determine the distance between the star’s home galaxy and our galactic neighborhood.
If astronomers can find stars that were kicked out of the same galaxy at different times, they can use them to measure the distance to that galaxy at different points in the past. By seeing how the distance has changed over time, astronomers can measure how fast the universe is expanding.
These superfast rogue stars could have another use as well. When supermassive black holes smash into each other, they generate ripples in space and time called gravitational waves, which reveal the intimate details of how the black holes coalesced. A space telescope called eLISA, scheduled to launch in 2028, is designed to detect gravitational waves. Because the superfast stars are produced when black holes are just about to merge, they would act as a sort of bat signal pointing eLISA to possible gravitational wave sources.
The existence of these stars would be one of the clearest signals that two supermassive black holes are on the verge of merging, says astrophysicist Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz of the University of California, Santa Cruz. Although they may be hard to detect, he adds, they will provide a completely novel tool for learning about the universe.
In about 4 billion years, our own Milky Way Galaxy will crash into the Andromeda Galaxy. The two supermassive black holes at their centers will merge, and stars could be thrown out. Our own sun is a bit too far from the galaxy’s center to get tossed, but one of the ejected stars might harbor a habitable planet. And if humans are still around, Loeb muses, they could potentially hitch a ride on that planet and travel to another galaxy. Who needs warp drive anyway?
Source : wired.com
Probably haven’t a clue what I’m talking about, but you would imagine two galaxies colliding would result in the termination of life on any inhabited planets coming close to a black hole with their Sun, either by acceleration or being ripped away from the goldilocks zone?
It can happen in region near galactic centers . Rest of the stars like our sun can survive the galactic collision .
Also there are very less chances of existence of any habitable planets near galactic centers. This is due to high radiation level in that region caused by supermassive black hole .
Reblogged this on Crash Course.
I find it interesting to be reminded of how fast the sun orbits the Milky Way’s center. 450,000 mph is super fast by earth’s standards. Just the thought of it is mind boggling.
The article ended with the question “Who needs warp drive anyway?”; reflecting on this I came up with the thought that if the human race is still around, wouldn’t they have left the Earth by then anyway? According to our current understanding of Solar evolution, the Sun is expected to have increased in brightness in two billion years from now, as its core runs out of Hydrogen fuel and begins the thermonuclear burning of Helium.
There are four potential methods human beings (possibly a select few of human beings), may leave the Earth:
* two involve slower than FTL interstellar drives; a multi-generation star ship or suspended animation (recently a science team, hoping to win the Nonprofit Brain Preservation Foundation’s Brain Preservation Technology Prize, has successfully frozen a rabbit’s brain and thawed it out without any signs of damage to the biological neural network);
* two involve FTL interstellar drives, such as wormhole travel or warp drive based on the Alcubierre Metric.
Hitching a ride on a hypervelocity star would certainly require some form of FTL interstellar drive to catch up with the star, whilst matching the trajectory and then land on a habitable planet. Of course hypervelocity stars would need to be surveyed in advance, using robotic probes with FTL interstellar drives to make sure the microbial environment on habitable planets is hospitable to our kind of life.